refers to a landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Below’s a brief overview:
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a nicely-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Case files could also be accessed from the public access terminals in the clerk’s office in the court where the case was filed.
maintaining the conviction awarded into the appellant reduce the sentence on the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced into the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
The case addresses A selection of issues which includes, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation of the right to life.
If a sufferer is shot at point-blank array, it may still be fair to infer that the accused meant death. However, that is not really always the case.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and also the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf from the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian ad litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for your dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all acting in their Work opportunities with DCFS.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been on the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally audio, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of the petitioners for promotion could possibly be thought of, however, we've been apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy subject towards the approval from the competent authority.
Online access into a statewide search of adult criminal case information within the juvenile & domestic relations district courts, criminal and traffic case information in general district courts and here choose circuit courts. Note: Payments cannot be made using this system.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved Until case is tried out(Bail Matters)
13309-B of 2010 for being weak types of evidence along with the evidentiary value whereof would be viewed in the time on the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, As a result, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is not going to serve any useful purpose at this stage.”
To receive notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia plus the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become out there, please enter your contact information under.